My entire existence has been focused by one easy question, “How did all of this begin”? By all of this I of course am referring to our entire universe. I have thought about this question for over 25 years, ราชภัฏสวนสุนันทา and I am 31 yoa now. Science was always definitely the subject. when i was growing up. I used to spend hours in high school discussing my own thoughts and ideas with my science teachers after school. I continued to do so even when I attended the University. I learned the three most popular and accepted ideas of the day. The most popular which is the Big Hammer Theory. The only credit I am happy to give the Big Hammer Theory is that it is possible, however; improbable it may be. What keeps the Big Hammer Theory alive is that there seems to be scientifically proven evidence that points to it as the one and only explanation. I would claim that all of the same evidence that relatively supports the Big Hammer can also support other theory. The one attaching point for me is the “Before Period”. What existed before the singularity exploded? Where did all the energy come from? We are talking, after all, about all of the energy contained within all of the matter in the universe; as well as all the free energy traveling this field. The Oscillating Universe Theory is nice, but it suffers the same problem; assuming there ever actually was a beginning. If the universe has always existed then it is a possible theory. The same is true for the Steady State Universe Theory. The notion that the universe has always existed, and will always exist as it has forever and ever. The only change in this model is the miles between galaxies, and other objects increases with new matter being created; so your universe continues to look the same in all directions The big problem with this theory is that we know the universe is not unchanging. It is growing and does change. We know that stars burst, exhaust their fuel and fade, or smash themselves into a singularity. This universe we live in is a very dynamic place. Galaxies battle, solar systems battle, planets and moons, and a whole host of objects can hit into one another at any time. The whole thing dancing to the gravitational music of the heavens. All of which points to not a comfortable state.
What I am about to propose in this paper is an idea that I have dwelled upon for years. It is a theory that we believe in, and has helped me come to a better understanding of our universe. It also goes beyond the attaching point of, “What came before”. In my opinion there are only two current ideas that produce sense. There is my theory of the nothing universe and there is the theory of God. No matter how hard I holder my brain I recently cannot come to any other conclusion. Either my theory is correct, the correct theory is not written, or God accounts for everything. We were holding the choices I gave myself, and for now My goal is to stick with my a conclusion. My goal now’s to share with you my theory with the world, and hope that it is a good one. I believe that this theory neatly ties together all of the lose ends of existence. I also believe that it is every bit as good as the Big Hammer Theory. With a clear understanding of our inception, we will be able to gain full insight into the inner ins and outs in our reality. I would also like to add that we refer to my theory as a theory because I believe most, if not all, of the evidence for the Big Hammer can also be used to support my theory.
The Nothing Universe
We are all familiar with our human reasoning behind nothing. When a bottle is empty, we say; “Nothing is in it”. We know that this is not actually the case. What we are referring to is the fact that what we thought should be in the bottle is no longer there. In order for nothing to truly be in the bottle, the bottle itself must have a vacuum. A vacuum is the complete absence of matter. This would be a perfect vacuum. Space is not a perfect vacuum, and it is difficult to say if a perfect vacuum can even exist. Regardless a vacuum is the true reasoning behind nothing, but it is not the truth form of nothing. What I am saying is our reasoning behind nothing and the true form of nothing are two different things. The truth state of there is nothing neutrality. A balance between charges in a perfectly arranged atom. This perfect atom I have named the Nothing Atom. This nothing atom consists of both matter and anti matter allergens joined together and separated by neutrons. The nothing atom consists of the proton, the neutron, the electron, as well as their anti matter counterparts. They all are closed together and kept from destroying each other by neutrons. I don’t know the actual arrangement of these allergens in this perfect atom, but that is immaterial. All that is important is the concept that they are all closed together in this one perfect Nothing Atom. The electron and the positron do not eliminate each other, because they occupy different orbital lobes. Again, I really do not know the actual arrangement of this atom; only that it existed. Needs to be perfect arrangement is, this perfectly natural Nothing Atom is the only thing that existed in the pre-universe and composed infinity entirely. No free spce existed between these atoms. There was no motion and there for no time, but we can use the concept of infinity to give us an idea of the state of the universe up until the purpose of the event.
So today we have the perfect nothing universe composed entirely of the natural and perfect Nothing Atom. All energy is closed up tight in the form of allergens getting back together this nothing universe. This is the state of the pre-universe (Nothing Universe) in all directions to infinity. Now, here comes the major dilemma of my theory. Perhaps it was Nuclear Fission or some unknown process local to this one particular form of matter? Something had to happen in one among these perfect Nothing Atoms to make it destabilize starting a archipelago reaction. Is the Nothing Atom a very heavy element, inwhich fission would sound right or is it smaller and some other reaction happened? Of this I am uncertain. What I do know is that something had to manufacture a destabilization of one of the allergens within the atom to lead to an irreparable archipelago reaction that would lead to the birth of the known universe. I refer to this as the EVENT.
Case represents the actual moment when the reaction began, and our universe begun to grow in this sea of atoms. Since the laws of physics do not exist, as of yet it is difficult for me to convey conclusively that nuclear fission lead to case. Quickly arranged fission tends to be less common among lighter elements. If it is responsible then the nothing atom is most likely a heavier element. If not then some other process had to cause case. Whatever the case may be, I have come up with a theory to go into detail why it had to happen based on the concept of probability. Statistically speaking, one must assume that when you are dealing with infinity; the probability of one event occurring is one in infinity. In other words that if an event can happen, however improbable; an opportunity still exists for its occurrence when infinity is looked at. As you of my former geology instructors, Doctor. Eastler, used to say, “It didn’t have to happen, but it had to happen. inch Once this one natural Nothing atom destabilized, it set into motion a archipelago reaction that would lead to the greatest single exploding market that will ever occur in the history of reality. Some may call it “the Big Bang”, I call it; “The Event”.
This is not a singularity exploding into existence, this is an atom triggering a archipelago reaction in a sea of perfect atoms. This reaction is quick and is, I believe, the only event currently occurring in our universe at a speed greater than that of the speed of light. This is why we do not see the light emanating from this expansion in our universe. I propose that if we could travel fast enough and far enough out into space we might eventually come to a wall of energy getting off us. I would call this the “Event Horizon” but that name has already been taken so i will refer to it as the “Creation Wave”. This wall of energy is the boundary between our universe and the nothing universe. Opposed to this of this wall of energy is the universe as it existed before the event. An endless sea of perfect nothing atoms awaiting their turn to be annihilated by the approaching “Creation Wave”. This means that our universe is still being created as you read this, and will continue to be created for everlasting. This may also explain certain observations our universe is not slowing down, but augmenting as it stretches outward. The creation trend is actually pulling the matter behind it outward due to the ongoing expansion, and or the immense gravity of the nothing universe opposed to this of the creation trend. Does gravity even exist yet? Do any of the laws of physics exist in the nothing universe? If that were true than our universe would in no way interact with or feel the nothing universe opposed to this of the creation trend. Even if there were an boundless amount of mass opposed to this. I am let’s say that the laws of physics are nullified by the form of the nothing atom. Whatever the case may be the creation trend is a constant trend of devastation getting off the center of the known universe at a mind boggling speed. This expansion also helps to explain why there is so much empty space out there. The universe we know is growing outward to fill empty space, where empty space had never existed. A universe full of matter and energy in our universe and matter and energy in the anti universe. If an anti universe exists. In this theory i must account to the lack of anti matter v. s matter in our universe. You have to ask the question, “Where did all of the anti-matter go”?
I have possibilities to offer as to why we are not blinded by and vaporized by the energy hitting theaters by this process. One possibility is that the mass of the nothing universe opposed to this of the Creation trend is greatly great, that the energy and light from the event is curved back towards the nothing universe as the Creation trend moves forward. In that scenerio there must be some interaction between our two universes beyond the creation trend. The second possibility is that the Creation trend is so distant from us now that the light emitted from this event cannot reach our region of space any longer. Leaving activities like background rays as the thumb print to this event. That’s not to say that if we develop the ability to look far enough out into space that we may not catch a view or some proof of this light, but I highly doubt it. This Creation trend has been traveling outwards at a speed greater than that of the speed of light for approximately 15 thousand years now. Assuming the universe is 15 thousand yoa.
Another event may have occurred at the exact moment that the Creation trend began its long journey outward and forever. A the actual moment the archipelago reaction began not just one, but two universes were born. The first universe is the matter universe and the second universe was the anti-matter universe. These two universes exist on two separate plains that I love to refer to as the “Above” and “Below” aircraft of existence. The “Central Plane” is where the nothing universe existed in one dimension and in perfect harmony. As soon as case occurred the majority of anti matter phased into a new dimension, or aircraft of existence. Similarly all of the matter in our known universe phased into its aircraft of existence. I have designated the matter universe as the Above aircraft, and I have designated the anti-matter universe the Below aircraft. These are two separate universes, on which consists of matter, and the other of anti-matter. Again, I would like to only deal with one universe in my theory, but I have to try and explain what happened to all of the anti-matter. There must be equal parts of matter and anti-matter to be the cause of. Then again could only matter prepare the perfect atom? Protons, Neutrons, and electrons linked together to form the nothing atom? Perhaps, but I can’t shake the that anti-matter is involved somehow.
Another way to possibly picture these two universes as existing simultaneously would be to envision all of the matter arranged the way it is in our matter universe, and then imagining that the anti matter that is arranged in the anti-matter universe as occupying the empty pockets of space in our universe. So, if you keep an eye out into space now in our universe you will notice that there is a lot of empty space out there. The same holds true for the anti matter universe. Matter in one universe occupies the empty space of the other universe and vice versa. We perceive it as empty space, because the other universe exists on a different dimensional aircraft of existence. This is the opposite possibility.
A link could exist between these two aircraft. This link can be found in the form of a black hole. A black holes gravity is so intense that it literally punches a hole into that other dimension. Just as anti matter is spewed out into our dimension from a black hole, I believe that matter is spewed forth from the same black hole into anti-matter space. A black hole may represent a bridge between the two aircraft. If you can imagine a matter black hole warping space and creating a wormhole that is associated with its counterpart or anti matter black hole. Perhaps they are one and the same or perhaps they occupy the same space at the same time. These two black holes being linked by a stable wormhole or perhaps black holes are linked to white holes. Perhaps white holes exist in the matter and anti matter universes as the outlets or the transfer between the two universes.
Black holes share a very common url to nys of the universe in the beginning and that is its very intense gravitational field. This field exists due to the sheer quantity of matter contained with in a small amount of space. The difference is that there was no free energy in the natural universe, all energy was closed up in allergens contained within the perfect atom. If there were any free space in that natural universe, no doubt the gravity would be of a strength we have nothing you’ve seen prior witnessed. A brilliant black hole would pale in comparison.
Nys in our universe today is that of chaos in an out of kilter universe. The same holds true in the anti matter universe. The universe that we know today is trying to go back fot it natural state. That is why atoms strive for balance. Sun and rain which exist today are thanks to processes that happened in stars. In this way our elements were the first things that begun to change in our universe, ultimately leading sun and rain required for the development of life.
I cannot say that the universe will never come back to the natural state of the nothing universe. The fact remains that 15 thousand years may be just a moment after the event on a general time scale. Organic beef be watching the very first stages in our universes existence. Perhaps one day events will take place in the universe to allow for a pocket of nothing material or natural matter to form. Is this what a black hole is? Perhaps it will grow slowly over time repairing itself and creating a new natural universe inside of an ever growing universe, encased by the first natural universe. Perhaps this trend of balance and chaos has been going on for a long time and the space that we understand exists between one of these ocean. Perhaps the whole lot exists balanced as a trend of existence and neutrality. These processes taking place on such a scale that we cannot even set out to comprehend the amount of time we are dealing with. I know believe that we are living in the first universe and the only person that will exist. The matter and anti matter universes existing on separate dimensional aircraft, changing matter and anti matter with one another through various processes such as black holes, and white holes.
I cannot conceive of this universe ever returning to a balanced natural nothing universe again. My belief is that we live in this relatively infant universe, the first to exist in infinity, and will exist in infinity from this point on. As i stated before though, you can never exclude possibilities. The possibility that matter in our universe will quickly failure in on itself may occur at some faraway point in the future. If the Creation trend gets far enough away from the center of the universe then perhaps its gravitational influence, if there is one, will drop below that of the influence of close by galaxies and all matter in between.
The universe could then set out to failure in on itself, reform the natural universe and the event would occur at some point in an even more faraway and mind boggling future. Like I said, I envision our universe as growing inside of the natural universe. At the same time the anti matter universe does the same principle alone aircraft of existence. Two universe, one to represent the matter universe that we live in and the other in the anti matter universe. One must assume that the laws of physics would exist in in the same way in both universes. I have not initiated to consider that question as of yet. I assume it does based on the fact that anti matter should interact in the same way that matter does in our universe. This is my working theory of the beginning of the universe. It is not concrete, but represents what may have been nys of the universe before the beginning.
I also believe that the same evidence that may serve to prove the Big Hammer theory may also serve to prove my theory. The data is not wrong, I am not saying that. The data was gathered using scientific methods which have been conducted over and over just to come to the same conclusion. The data is entirely correct; I maintain that the conclusion that the evidence is caused by is wrong. I plan on writing a more comprehensive paper presenting the theory of the Nothing Universe if this Theory is reasonably well accepted. I will then give you the scientific breakthrough discoveries that we believe will provide far more support for my a conclusion than for the Big Hammer conclusion. Article Source: